Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:06:38 +0000 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: qup: Request CS GPIO's during probe |
| |
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 10:10:56AM +0200, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > On Mon, 2015-03-09 at 18:28 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > About the API usage, point taken. GPIO requesting part is more important > > > in this case. pinctrl core did not request pins and wrong DT configuration > > > could lead to surprises without any warnings or errors.
> > That doesn't answer my concern at all.
> I am not sure that I am following you.
> I can not use spi_master::cs_gpios, which is populated by > of_spi_register_master(), because spi_register_master() > populate SPI devices and they could issue setup method.
I'm sorry but I can't parse the above. What does "they could issue setup method" mean and why is it a problem?
> Requesting GPIO's in core framework is also not a easy > option because of arguments here[1].
We should really fix that though. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |