lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/5] Reenable might_sleep() checks for might_fault()
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 03:19:11PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Thomas, Peter,
>
> anything that speaks against putting the pagefault_disable counter into
> thread_info (my series) instead of task_struct (rt tree)?
>
> IOW, what would be the right place for it?

I think we put it in task_struct because lazy; ARM seems one of the few
popular archs where current still goes through thread_info.

And that I think is the only reason to maybe use thread_info, cost of
access. The down-side of using thread_info is of course that it reduces
stack size.

In any case; I think that if you want to go do this; please consider the
route -rt took and completely separate the two, don't leave the
preempt_count_{inc,dec} remnant in pagefault_{en,dis}able() at all.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-02-09 16:01    [W:0.113 / U:1.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site