lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/2] mmc: dw_mmc: fix bug that cause 'Timeout sending command'
Hi, Addy.

On 02/09/2015 04:25 PM, Addy Ke wrote:
> Because of some uncertain factors, such as worse card or worse hardware,
> DAT[3:0](the data lines) may be pulled down by card, and mmc controller
> will be in busy state. This should not happend when mmc controller
> send command to update card clocks. If this happends, mci_send_cmd will
> be failed and we will get 'Timeout sending command', and then system will
> be blocked. To avoid this, we need reset mmc controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Addy Ke <addy.ke@rock-chips.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> index 4d2e3c2..b0b57e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
> @@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ struct idmac_desc {
> };
> #endif /* CONFIG_MMC_DW_IDMAC */
>
> +static int dw_mci_card_busy(struct mmc_host *mmc);
> static bool dw_mci_reset(struct dw_mci *host);
> static bool dw_mci_ctrl_reset(struct dw_mci *host, u32 reset);
>
> @@ -888,6 +889,31 @@ static void mci_send_cmd(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 cmd, u32 arg)
> cmd, arg, cmd_status);
> }
>
> +static void dw_mci_wait_busy(struct dw_mci_slot *slot)
> +{
> + struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
> + unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(500);
> +
> + do {
> + if (!dw_mci_card_busy(slot->mmc))
> + return;
> + cpu_relax();
> + } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
> +
> + dev_err(host->dev, "Data busy (status %#x)\n",
> + mci_readl(slot->host, STATUS));
> +
> + /*
> + * Data busy, this should not happend when mmc controller send command
> + * to update card clocks in non-volt-switch state. If it happends, we
> + * should reset controller to avoid getting "Timeout sending command".
> + */
> + dw_mci_ctrl_reset(host, SDMMC_CTRL_ALL_RESET_FLAGS);

If reset is failed, then dw_mci_ctrl_reset should return "false".

ret = dw_mci_ctrl_reset();

WARN_ON(!ret || dw_mci_card_busy(slot->mmc));

Is it right?

In my experiment, if reset is failed or card is busy, eMMC can't work anymore..right?
I think this patch is reasonable to prevent blocking issue.

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung


> +
> + /* Fail to reset controller or still data busy, WARN_ON! */
> + WARN_ON(dw_mci_card_busy(slot->mmc));
> +}
> +
> static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, bool force_clkinit)
> {
> struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
> @@ -899,6 +925,8 @@ static void dw_mci_setup_bus(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, bool force_clkinit)
> /* We must continue to set bit 28 in CMD until the change is complete */
> if (host->state == STATE_WAITING_CMD11_DONE)
> sdmmc_cmd_bits |= SDMMC_CMD_VOLT_SWITCH;
> + else
> + dw_mci_wait_busy(slot);
>
> if (!clock) {
> mci_writel(host, CLKENA, 0);
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-02-09 11:21    [W:0.169 / U:49.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site