[lkml]   [2015]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: nvram and generic_nvram modules are problematic, was Re: [PATCH] arch: m68k: mac: misc.c: Remove some unused functions

On Sun, 1 Feb 2015, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 02:39:42PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
> > I find the ARM support in drivers/char/nvram to be surprising, not to
> > say questionable. The /proc/driver/nvram implementation, given
> > defined(__arm__), decodes the NVRAM contents in exactly the same
> > format as when defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__).
> That's because it's used on the Netwinder and EBSA285 platforms, which
> are PCI-like, complete with a southbridge which makes them look like a
> PC.

Well, that explains the presence of RTC NVRAM, but the question was also
about the format of that NVRAM.

The the code in question in drivers/char/nvram.c decodes RTC NVRAM on ARM
as if it took the same format as x86 PC RTC NVRAM. Apparently they are not
in the same format (for EBSA-285 at least).

I downloaded the EBSA-285 BIOS,

This is from bios/init/cfg.c --

img_nr = rtc_read_cmos(0);
root_dev = rtc_read_cmos(2) | rtc_read_cmos(3) << 8;

for (i = 0; i < 80; i++) {
extra_args[i] = rtc_read_cmos(128+i);
if (!extra_args[i])
extra_args[79] = '\0';

(Like /dev/nvram, file offset 0 is actually device offset 14.)

This EBSA-285 BIOS code uses bytes 128 through 208 as "extra_args",
whereas /dev/nvram has only 114 bytes in total. The EBSA-285 BIOS doesn't
read or write any checksum.

The first two bytes aren't reported in /proc/driver/nvram, whereas
EBSA-285 BIOS uses them for img_nr and root_dev. The next one is reported
as "floppy type" on x86 PC, though the EBSA-285 BIOS uses it for
root_dev >> 8.

This is from an x86 PC, for example:

# cat /proc/driver/nvram
Checksum status: valid
# floppies : 1
Floppy 0 type : none
Floppy 1 type : none
HD 0 type : 01
HD 1 type : none
HD type 48 data: 512/0/0 C/H/S, precomp 0, lz 256
HD type 49 data: 1/124/0 C/H/S, precomp 0, lz 0
DOS base memory: 640 kB
Extended memory: 64512 kB (configured), 64512 kB (tested)
Gfx adapter : EGA, VGA, ... (with BIOS)
FPU : installed

My original question was whether the CONFIG_PROC_FS support found in
drivers/char/nvram.c should be moved to arch/x86 and arch/m68k.

So that question now seems to hinge on the Netwinder ROM ("nettrom") which
I gather is proprietary (I didn't find any source code). Does anyone know
what format the Netwinder NVRAM takes?

If NVRAM on Netwinder has a different format to x86 PC, then the
CONFIG_PROC_FS code in drivers/char/nvram should go elsewhere.

And if the NVRAM on Netwinder had no checksum, drivers/char/nvram.c would
become a generic /dev/nvram misc device, and drivers/char/generic_nvram.c
could go away, along with its inherent problems.


 \ /
  Last update: 2015-02-03 07:21    [W:0.058 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site