Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:43:04 +0100 | From | Uwe Kleine-König <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 02/18] ARM: ARMv7M: Enlarge vector table to 256 entries |
| |
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:29:52AM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote: > 2015-02-23 11:33 GMT+01:00 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>: > > 2015-02-20 20:47 GMT+01:00 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>: > >> Who do you target to apply this series? > > > > I guess it should go through Russell's Patch Tracking System? > > Sorry, I answered your question too quickly. > I meant this patch should go through Russell's Patch Tracking System. > > For the other patches, I think it should be picked by their respective > maintainers. > Or I can create an immutable tag (on github or kernel.org?) that will > be merged by the different sub-systems? > What would you advise? Depends on the interdependencies of your patches. If each maintainer can just pick up the patches affecting his area on top of (say) 4.0-rc1 that would be good.
Best regards Uwe
-- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
| |