Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:16:11 +0000 | From | Will Deacon <> | Subject | Re: stand-alone kvmtool |
| |
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 05:23:58PM +0000, Pekka Enberg wrote: > Hi,
Hi Pekka,
Sorry for the delay, I've been away from email for a few days.
> On 2/18/15 5:50 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > > Thanks for doing this. Since it looks unlikely that kvmtool will ever be > > merged back into the kernel tree, it makes sense to cut the dependency > > in my opinion. > > I am certainly OK with a standalone repository which preserves the > history. Will, would you like to take over the proposed new repository > and put it somewhere on git.kernel.org, perhaps?
Sure thing. I'll sync-up with Andre and reply back here when we've got something sensible.
One extra point that I don't think has been mentioned in this thread so far is that separating kvmtool from the kernel sources is likely a prerequisite for distribution packaging. Once we've got something sorted out, I'll poke some friendly local debian developers and see if they can't package it up for us.
Will
| |