Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Feb 2015 12:28:41 -0300 | From | Ezequiel Garcia <> | Subject | Re: nios2: is the ptrace ABI correct? |
| |
Hi Arnd,
On 02/24/2015 05:54 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 24 February 2015 00:04:21 Ezequiel Garcia wrote: >> So, tried a different approach and removed pt_regs from the UAPI ptrace.h, >> replacing it with a new user_regs that describes how registers are passed >> to user. This however is also problematic, as pt_regs is already used >> by glibc (not really sure what for). >> > > I've looked at glibc and could not find a use for pt_regs there. Where > did you find it? It's quite possible that it's incorrect as well > if the structures don't match. >
Gah, no, you are right. I got confused.
So it would be OK to avoid remove pt_regs from the uapi headers? How does this affect the signal handling nios2 implementation?
-- Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur www.vanguardiasur.com.ar
| |