lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: nios2: is the ptrace ABI correct?
Hi Arnd,

On 02/24/2015 05:54 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 February 2015 00:04:21 Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>> So, tried a different approach and removed pt_regs from the UAPI ptrace.h,
>> replacing it with a new user_regs that describes how registers are passed
>> to user. This however is also problematic, as pt_regs is already used
>> by glibc (not really sure what for).
>>
>
> I've looked at glibc and could not find a use for pt_regs there. Where
> did you find it? It's quite possible that it's incorrect as well
> if the structures don't match.
>

Gah, no, you are right. I got confused.

So it would be OK to avoid remove pt_regs from the uapi headers?
How does this affect the signal handling nios2 implementation?

--
Ezequiel Garcia, VanguardiaSur
www.vanguardiasur.com.ar


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-02-24 16:41    [W:0.063 / U:1.656 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site