Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 23 Feb 2015 17:44:07 -0500 | From | Murali Karicheri <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 0/7] PCI: get DMA configuration from parent device |
| |
On 02/23/2015 05:15 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Murali Karicheri<m-karicheri2@ti.com> wrote: >> On 02/11/2015 11:58 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote: >>> >>> On 02/11/2015 11:54 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/06/2015 01:36 PM, Murali Karicheri wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 02/06/2015 12:53 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Murali Karicheri<m-karicheri2@ti.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 02/06/2015 10:15 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 09:52:52PM +0000, Murali Karicheri wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> This patch add an important capability to PCI driver on Keystone. I >>>>>>>>> hope >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> have this merged to the upstream branch so that it is available for >>>>>>>>> v3.20. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's very late for 3.20 and the code hasn't been in linux-next at all >>>>>>>> (but it's not me who's merging this code), unless you can squeeze >>>>>>>> it in >>>>>>>> as a bug-fix. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is in fact a bug fix as PCI on Keystone is broken without this. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh, sorry, I didn't realize that this was so urgent. I guess I read >>>>>> "this adds an important capability" in the cover letter and concluded >>>>>> that it was new functionality. >>>>> >>>>> Bjorn, >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for responding. >>>>> >>>>> Let me give you some context on this without which my explanation won't >>>>> be complete. For using PCI driver on Keystone, I had submitted patches >>>>> related to machine and DTS to the arm mailing list to enable the driver >>>>> on Keystone. Subsequenty one of the patch from my series was Nack-ed and >>>>> I was asked to implememented in a different way and started this series. >>>>> You can refer to the discussion of this at >>>>> >>>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linux/kernel/2024591 >>>>> >>>>> The PCI driver enablement on Keystone is still a working in progress and >>>>> I am trying to get it fully functional on the upstream. Another missing >>>>> piece is the SerDes phy driver patch. We have started working on the >>>>> other part (SerDes phy driver) already as the initial one was not >>>>> accepted. So it is fine if we are too late for the v3.20 merge window to >>>>> merge this series and this can be applied to the next branch for v3.21. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyway, if it's broken, presumably PCI on Keystone *did* work at one >>>>>> point. Can you identify the commit that broke it and requires these >>>>>> fixes, so we can figure out how far the fixes need to be backported? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I am trying to get this driver enabled on Keystone by adding the missing >>>>> pieces as described above. So I guess we don't have to back port >>>>> anything here. >>>>> >>>>>> If I merge it, I would like to get into my for-linus branch and get a >>>>>> little time in -next before asking Linus to pull it. The merge window >>>>>> is a little wrinkle there -- I don't like to add new things to the mix >>>>>> during the window. But if it's an important fix we can still get it >>>>>> in before the final v3.20. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please apply this to next branch for v3.21. It currently apply cleanly >>>>> to v3.19-rc7. If you want me rebase to another branch, let me know I can >>>>> apply and send you an updated patch. >>>>> >>>> Bjorn, Arnd, >>>> >>>> I am assuming, Bjorn is going to merge this to his next branch for >>>> v3.21. If not, it might have to be merged through the arm soc? There are >>>> a couple of Tested-by and Acked-by received after v7. Do you want me to >>>> post v8 with these updated in the patches? >>> >>> FYI. >>> >>> These are the updates. >>> Series was >>> >>> 1) Tested-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit<Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> >>> (on AMD Seattle platform w/ PCI Generic Host controller) >>> 2) Acked-by: Will Deacon<will.deacon@arm.com> >>> 3) Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas<catalin.marinas@arm.com> >>> >> Bjorn, >> >> I haven't seen a reply from my above email. As soon as you are ready to pull >> this to v4.1 next (originally requested for v3.21 as per above email)branch, >> please let me know and I can send you an updated version rebased to your >> next branch and with the above acks. > > My "next" and "for-linus" branches will be based on v4.0-rc1, so > that's the ideal base for patches. I don't expect any significant > changes that would require a rebase, so unless something in your > patches themselves has changed since you last posted them, you don't > need to repost them just for a rebase. > Bjorn,
Thanks for the response.
Nothing from my side except for the above acks/tested-by/reviewed-by
Murali > Bjorn
-- Murali Karicheri Linux Kernel, Texas Instruments
| |