Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 23 Feb 2015 10:41:51 -0600 (CST) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] capabilities: Ambient capability set V1 |
| |
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> If you set ambient caps and then run a setuid program (without > no_new_privs), then the ambient set *must* be cleared by the kernel > because that's what the setuid program expects. Yes, the whole
Why would a setuid program expect that? I'd say we expect the ambient set to remain in effect. What would break if the ambient set would stay active?
| |