lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 1/5] xhci: add a quirk for device disconnection errata for Synopsis Designware USB3 core
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:39:53PM +0800, Sneeker Yeh wrote:
> Hi,
> 2015/2/18 下午10:34 於 "Felipe Balbi" <balbi@ti.com> 寫道:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 10:47:45AM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > This looks correct, but if you are still going to make a new series
> fixing
> > > Felipe's comments then the following tiny nitpicks could be fixed as
> well.
> > >
> > > Otherwise
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Felipe, Do you want to take this series through your tree?
> >
> > I can, no issues :-)
> >
> > > On 17.02.2015 07:41, Sneeker Yeh wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +static void xhci_try_to_clear_csc(struct usb_hcd *hcd, int
> dev_port_num)
> > >
> > > Either add a function description explaining something like "Late
> > > clearing of connect status.
> > > Some quirky hardware will suspend the controller when CSC bit is
> > > cleared and leave URBs unhandled"
> > >
> > > Or change the function name to something like
> > > xhci_late_csc_clear_quirk() or xhci_deferred_csc_clear_quirk()
> >
> > I have a feeling xhci_late_csc_clear_quirk() is a better name, much more
> > descriptive than xhci_try_to_clear_csc() :-)
>
> Hmm, I'll use this one, ^^
> Thanks for comment it.

alright, either one is fine :-)

--
balbi
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-02-18 16:01    [W:0.040 / U:0.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site