[lkml]   [2015]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH V5] x86 spinlock: Fix memory corruption on completing completions
Well, I regret I mentioned the lack of barrier after enter_slowpath ;)

On 02/15, Raghavendra K T wrote:
> @@ -46,7 +46,8 @@ static __always_inline bool static_key_false(struct static_key *key);
> static inline void __ticket_enter_slowpath(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> {
> - set_bit(0, (volatile unsigned long *)&lock->tickets.tail);
> + set_bit(0, (volatile unsigned long *)&lock->tickets.head);
> + barrier();
> }

Because this barrier() looks really confusing.

Firsty, it is equally unneeded on x86. At the same time, it can not help.
We need a memory barrier() between set_bit(SLOWPATH) and READ_ONCE(head)
to avoid the race with spin_unlock().

So I think you should replace it with smp_mb__after_atomic() or remove it.

Other than that I believe this version is correct. So I won't insist, this
is cosmetic after all.


 \ /
  Last update: 2015-02-15 17:41    [W:0.093 / U:4.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site