[lkml]   [2015]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: checkpatch induced patches...
Am 11.02.2015 um 23:43 schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 12:43:03PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>> Maybe some help/warning text like:
>> --force Without --force, checkpatch will not scan files
>> using -f or --file outside of drivers/staging/...
>> Do not use this option merely to create potential
>> patches that are uncompiled or untested.
> Everyone compiles their patches hopefully? The problem is with patches
> that aren't really a cleanup but are just done to make checkpatch happy.
> I guess documenting --force is better than not documenting.

Documentation is like sex: when it is good, it is very, very good; and when it is bad, it is better than nothing. -- Dick Brandon


 \ /
  Last update: 2015-02-12 00:01    [W:0.082 / U:4.932 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site