lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2 RESEND] clk: mxs: Fix invalid 32-bit access to frac registers
Hi Fabio,

> Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> hat am 11. Februar 2015 um 17:58
> geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> wrote:
> > Hi Fabio,
> >
> >> Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> hat am 10. Februar 2015 um 16:06
> >> geschrieben:
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Stefan,
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Could you apply only the clk-imx28.c part of my patch and see what
> >> > happens?
> >>
> >> If I apply only the clk-imx28.c part of your patch I can successfully
> >> probe the SPI NOR.
> >
> > thanks this is very helpful. I built the linux-next for my Duckbill and add
> > the
> > SSP2 section from imx28-evk.dts into imx28-duckbill.dts.
> >
> > Without my patch i get the following for HW_CLKCTRL_FRAC0:
> >
> > ./memwatch -a 0x800401B0
> >
> > 0x800401b0: 0x5e5b5513
> >
> > With my patch i get:
> >
> > ./memwatch -a 0x800401B0
> >
> > 0x800401b0: 0x5e1b5513
>
> I always get 0x5e5b5513 with or without your patch.

very strange. Do you have any idea why IO1_STABLE is permanent low?

Here are the register dumps as requested by Mike.

Without this patch after boot

0x80040000: 0x00060000
0x80040010: 0x800004b1
0x80040050: 0x00011001
0x80040080: 0x64000001
0x80040090: 0x00000001
0x800400a0: 0x80000001
0x800400b0: 0x00000002
0x800400c0: 0xa0000001
0x800401b0: 0x5e5b5513
0x800401c0: 0x00929292
0x800401d0: 0x00004104

With this patch after boot

0x80040000: 0x00060000
0x80040010: 0x800004b1
0x80040050: 0x00011001
0x80040080: 0x64000001
0x80040090: 0x00000001
0x800400a0: 0x80000001
0x800400b0: 0x00000002
0x800400c0: 0xa0000001
0x800401b0: 0x5e1b5513
0x800401c0: 0x00929292
0x800401d0: 0x00004104

So only IO1_STABLE (0x800401b0) is different.

If i restore clk_ref_set_rate() from clk-ref.c after the complete patch is
applied, the issue with the IO1_STABLE bit disappears.

Can you confirm the behavior according to your flash issue?

I think it would be the best to revert my patch. Sorry for the trouble.

Stefan

>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-02-11 21:41    [W:0.082 / U:5.816 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site