Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 9 Dec 2015 15:03:57 +0100 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [Questions] perf c2c: What's the current status of perf c2c? |
| |
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 06:02:44AM -0500, Joe Mario wrote: > Yes, that would be a great enhancement,
This is hardly new though; I've outlined the very same the first time the c2c thing got mentioned.
> but is it any reason to hold up the current implementation?
I just wonder how much of c2c is still useful once we get it done proper. And once such a tool is out there, its hard to kill, leaving us with a maintenance burden we could do without.
| |