lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 01/23] mtd: kill the ecclayout->oobavail field
Hi Priit,

On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 08:43:05 +0200
Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 23:25 +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > ecclayout->oobavail is just redundant with the mtd->oobavail field.
> > Moreover, it prevents static const definition of ecc layouts since
> > the
> > NAND framework is calculating this value based on the ecclayout-
> > >oobfree
> > field.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mtd/devices/docg3.c                   |  5 ++-
> >  drivers/mtd/mtdswap.c                         | 16 ++++-----
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c          |  3 --
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/docg4.c                      |  1 -
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/hisi504_nand.c               |  1 -
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c                  | 12 +++----
> >  drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c            | 16 ++++-----
> >  drivers/mtd/tests/oobtest.c                   | 49 +++++++++++++--
> > ------------
> >  drivers/staging/mt29f_spinand/mt29f_spinand.c |  1 -
> >  fs/jffs2/wbuf.c                               |  6 ++--
> >  include/linux/mtd/mtd.h                       |  1 -
> >  11 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
> >
> [..]
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> > b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> > index 35d78f7..a906ec2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/brcmnand/brcmnand.c
> > @@ -845,9 +845,6 @@ static struct nand_ecclayout *brcmnand_create_layout(int ecc_level,
> >   break;
> >   }
> >  out:
> > - /* Sum available OOB */
> > - for (i = 0; i < MTD_MAX_OOBFREE_ENTRIES_LARGE; i++)
> > - layout->oobavail += layout->oobfree[i].length;
> >   return layout;
> >  }
>
> You can get rid of the 'out' label and replace the single goto in this
> function with 'return layout'.

Yep, I'll fix that.

>
> [...]
> >  
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> > b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> > index 0748a13..1107f5c1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> > @@ -2037,7 +2037,7 @@ static int nand_do_read_oob(struct mtd_info
> > *mtd, loff_t from,
> >   stats = mtd->ecc_stats;
> >  
> >   if (ops->mode == MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB)
> > - len = chip->ecc.layout->oobavail;
> > + len = mtd->oobavail;
> >   else
> >   len = mtd->oobsize;
> >  
> > @@ -2728,7 +2728,7 @@ static int nand_do_write_oob(struct mtd_info
> > *mtd, loff_t to,
> >    __func__, (unsigned int)to, (int)ops-
> > >ooblen);
> >  
> >   if (ops->mode == MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB)
> > - len = chip->ecc.layout->oobavail;
> > + len = mtd->oobavail;
> >   else
> >   len = mtd->oobsize;
> >  
> [...]
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c
> > b/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c
> > index 43b3392..d70bbfd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/onenand_base.c
> > @@ -1125,7 +1125,7 @@ static int onenand_mlc_read_ops_nolock(struct
> > mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from,
> >   (int)len);
> >  
> >   if (ops->mode == MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB)
> > - oobsize = this->ecclayout->oobavail;
> > + oobsize = mtd->oobavail;
> >   else
> >   oobsize = mtd->oobsize;
> >  
> > @@ -1230,7 +1230,7 @@ static int onenand_read_ops_nolock(struct
> > mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from,
> >   (int)len);
> >  
> >   if (ops->mode == MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB)
> > - oobsize = this->ecclayout->oobavail;
> > + oobsize = mtd->oobavail;
> >   else
> >   oobsize = mtd->oobsize;
> >  
> > @@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@ static int onenand_read_oob_nolock(struct
> > mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from,
> >   ops->oobretlen = 0;
> >  
> >   if (mode == MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB)
> > - oobsize = this->ecclayout->oobavail;
> > + oobsize = mtd->oobavail;
> >   else
> >   oobsize = mtd->oobsize;
> >  
> > @@ -1887,7 +1887,7 @@ static int onenand_write_ops_nolock(struct
> > mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to,
> >   return 0;
> >  
> >   if (ops->mode == MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB)
> > - oobsize = this->ecclayout->oobavail;
> > + oobsize = mtd->oobavail;
> >   else
> >   oobsize = mtd->oobsize;
> >  
> > @@ -2063,7 +2063,7 @@ static int onenand_write_oob_nolock(struct
> > mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to,
> >   ops->oobretlen = 0;
> >  
> >   if (mode == MTD_OPS_AUTO_OOB)
> > - oobsize = this->ecclayout->oobavail;
> > + oobsize = mtd->oobavail;
> >   else
> >   oobsize = mtd->oobsize;
>
> This identical construction seems to occur multiple times in multiple
> files. Would it make sense to create a macro for it?

Right, I'll make another patch move this logic into an inline function.

Thanks for the review.

Boris


--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-12-08 09:41    [W:0.068 / U:1.416 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site