Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 8 Dec 2015 14:51:15 +0100 (CET) | From | Jiri Kosina <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] fs/super.c: use && instead of & for warn_on condition |
| |
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > --- a/fs/super.c > > +++ b/fs/super.c > > @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ int __sb_start_write(struct super_block *sb, int level, bool wait) > > else > > ret = percpu_down_read_trylock(sb->s_writers.rw_sem + level-1); > > > > - WARN_ON(force_trylock & !ret); > > + WARN_ON(force_trylock && !ret); > > OOPS! yes, this is a typo, thanks! Harmless in this particular case, > but still. > > Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Doesn't seem to be in linux-next as of today, so I am taking it now. Thanks,
-- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
| |