lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: gigaset: freeing an active object
From
Date
Am 07.12.2015 um 13:25 schrieb Paul Bolle:

>>> Otherwise we'd still be freeing memory
>>> managed through reference counting.
>>
>> Now I#m confused. I thought by following Peter's suggestion to put the
>> kfree() in the release method we'd avoid just that.
>
> Apparently it does, because I can't trigger the WARNING we're discussing
> here with your patch applied.

Nice.

> I'll have to dive into this stuff again,
> because apparently my mental model of what's going on is incomplete at
> best.

I won't claim anything like completeness for mine.

> In the mean time you might want to turn your patch into something that
> can actually be applied (with or without my Sign-off or Ack; I don't
> care how it finds its way into the tree). Please add add
> Fixes: 2869b23e4b95 ("[PATCH] drivers/isdn/gigaset: new M101 driver (v2)")

Will do. (Not today, though.)

Regards,
Tilman

--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc
Bonn, Germany
Nous, on a des fleurs et des bougies pour nous protéger.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-12-07 20:01    [W:0.329 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site