lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v2 7/8] spi: lm70llp: use dev_warn
Date
As we have a struct device available it is better to use dev_warn()
instead of printk.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
---
drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c b/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c
index 9d45a63..393eb2b 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-lm70llp.c
@@ -249,9 +249,8 @@ static void spi_lm70llp_attach(struct parport *p)
*/
status = spi_bitbang_start(&pp->bitbang);
if (status < 0) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING
- "%s: spi_bitbang_start failed with status %d\n",
- DRVNAME, status);
+ dev_warn(&pd->dev, "spi_bitbang_start failed with status %d\n",
+ status);
goto out_off_and_release;
}

@@ -278,7 +277,7 @@ static void spi_lm70llp_attach(struct parport *p)
dev_dbg(&pp->spidev_lm70->dev, "spidev_lm70 at %s\n",
dev_name(&pp->spidev_lm70->dev));
else {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: spi_new_device failed\n", DRVNAME);
+ dev_warn(&pd->dev, "spi_new_device failed\n");
status = -ENODEV;
goto out_bitbang_stop;
}
--
1.9.1


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-12-07 12:01    [W:0.107 / U:0.776 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site