Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 4 Dec 2015 17:06:42 -0800 | From | Josh Triplett <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/10] Expedited-grace-period changes for 4.5 |
| |
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 03:58:51PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Hello! > > This series contains follow-on cleanup changes to RCU's expedited > grace-period functionality. The patches in this series are as follows: > > 1. Short-circuit synchronize_sched_expedited() if there is only one CPU. > > 2. Update comment to clarify the role of ->expmaskinitnext. > > 3. Separate concerns by moving smp_mb() from rcu_seq_snap() to > rcu_exp_gp_seq_snap(). > > 4. Safe a few lines of code by inverting the sense of > sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus() "if" statement. > > 5. Reduce expedited GP memory contention via per-CPU variables. > > 6. Get rid of (some) empty stall-warning messages by resolving > stall-warning ties. > > 7. Add more diagnostics to expedited stall warning messages. > > 8. Add rcu_normal kernel parameter to suppress expediting for > the benefit of aggressive real-time systems. > > 9-10. Allow expedited grace periods to be disabled just before init > is spawned, allowing them to speed up boot without interfering > with run-time real-time workloads.
This cover letter doesn't seem to match the patch series that shows up as replies to it. The patch series has 13 patches, numbered 01/13 to 13/13. You sent a separate cover letter, not part of this thread, that seems to match up.
| |