Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree | From | Matias Bjørling <> | Date | Thu, 3 Dec 2015 12:07:23 +0100 |
| |
On 12/03/2015 11:21 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 11:09:03AM +0100, Matias Bjørling wrote: >> Similar to this? > > For the interface yes. Now just get rid of using nvme_ns entirely - > seems like you just want ns_id and lba_shift, and those should fit > well into nvm_dev I think. >
What is the reason to keep the nvme_ns internally to the nvme core?
We can definitely move ->nsid and the lba_shift into nvm_dev. Only thing I have is that it moves a small part of nvme logic into the lightnvm core.
| |