lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/2] Improve drm_of_component_probe() and move rockchip to use it
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 06:20:33PM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 10:05:34 +0000
> Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> wrote:
>
> > > What was the reason to keep the "ports" node instead of the device?
> >
> > The function is an extract of common code sprinkled through a few DRM drivers,
> > they all used port rather than port->parent.
>
> Sorry for I could find such drivers. May you give me any pointer?

imx-drm probably.

> > Have a look at my v2 where I've introduced two compare functions and also
> > modified the Rockchip compare_port() to use port->parent in the comparison. I
> > guess that should solve your problem.
>
> Keeping the port instead of the parent asks for more code, but,
> especially, it also asks for changes in the component drivers because,
> at bind time, in 'data', they get a port instead of the device.

Sorry, this doesn't make sense. You have far too many sub-clauses
which mean nothing at all. Please rephrase.

--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-12-23 20:21    [W:0.102 / U:0.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site