Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:50:23 -0800 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] Staging: dgnc: dgnc_neo.c: usleep_range is preferred over udelay |
| |
On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 08:10:42PM +0530, Nizam Haider wrote: > Fix ceckpatch warning
spelling?
> > Signed-off-by: Nizam Haider <nijamh@cdac.in> > --- > drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c | 10 +++++----- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c > index 8106f52..cf5bfc7 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c > @@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ static void neo_flush_uart_write(struct channel_t *ch) > /* Check to see if the UART feels it completely flushed the FIFO. */ > tmp = readb(&ch->ch_neo_uart->isr_fcr); > if (tmp & 4) > - udelay(10); > + usleep_range(10, 50);
Where did you get this range from? Did you make it up? Please don't.
greg k-h
| |