Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] tpm_tis: Clean up force module parameter | From | Peter Huewe <> | Date | Wed, 02 Dec 2015 01:02:13 -0800 |
| |
Am 2. Dezember 2015 00:14:23 PST, schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>: >On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 05:15:14PM -0800, Peter Huewe wrote: >> >> >> Am 1. Dezember 2015 14:22:23 PST, schrieb Jason Gunthorpe ><jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>: >> >On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 11:33:51PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: >> > >> >> I went through the patches and didn't see anything that would >shock >> >me >> >> enough not to apply the patches in the current if they also work >when >> >> tested *but* are these release critical for Linux v4.4? >> >> >> >> I got a bit confused about the discussion that was going on about >> >"where >> >> to fix the probe" crash whether or not both it should be fixed in >> >both >> >> places. >> > >> >I'm also confused by that.. >> > >> >It sounds like force=1 is broken in 4.4 right now - do we care? >Should >> >we fix this by using Martin's patch? >> >> I'm not 100% sure if force=1 is broken in 4.3 as well, as I oops when >> I have my tpm_crb loaded and then call modprobe tpm_tis force=1 >> Peter > >It'd have to be a different regression because v4.3 does not contain >the >change that breaks this in v4.4. You had a NUC with discrete TPM >module, >am I remembering right? > Nope, intel fw tpm2.0 in my acer laptop. No nucs here >/Jarkko
-- Sent from my mobile
| |