lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/7] staging: lustre: Delete unnecessary goto statements in six functions
From
Date
On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 17:41 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 06:27:56AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 14:52 +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> > > Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 09:30:47 +0100
> > >
> > > Six goto statements referred to a source code position directly behind them.
> > > Thus omit such unnecessary jumps.
> >
> > I suggest you leave a blank line instead
> > of deleting the goto.
> >
>
> What is the point of the little bunny hop?
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>

-ENOPARSE little bunny hop
(though I could have said "just leave a blank line)

I think that code blocks are more obvious to read.

This is the original code:

result = foo();
if (result)
goto label;

result = bar();
if (result)
goto label;

result = baz();
if (result)
goto label;

label:
go on...

He proposes:

result = foo();
if (result)
goto label;

result = bar();
if (result)
goto label;

result = baz();
label:
go on...


I don't find the test->goto label; label: use offensive,
but if he does, I think keeping a blank line in place of
the test->goto might be better.

result = foo();
if (result)
goto label;

result = bar();
if (result)
goto label;

result = baz();

label:
go on...



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-12-15 16:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and my Meterkast|Read the blog