Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:42:31 +0900 | From | Namhyung Kim <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 6/6] perf tools: Try to show pretty printed output for dynamic sort keys |
| |
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 01:24:26PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 09:13:20PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 07:36:37AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Em Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 10:03:29AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:46:13AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > > > Each tracepoint event has format string for print to improve > > > > > readability. Try to parse the output and match the field name. If it > > > > > finds one, use that for the result. If not, fallbacks to the original > > > > > output. > > > > > > > > > > For example, sort on kmem:kmalloc.gfp_flags looks like below: > > > > > (Note: libtraceevent plugins are not installed on my system. They might > > > > > affect the output below) > > > > > > > > > > Before: > > > > > # Overhead Command gfp_flags > > > > > # ........ ....... .......... > > > > > # > > > > > 99.89% perf 32848 > > > > > 0.06% sleep 208 > > > > > 0.03% perf 32976 > > > > > 0.01% perf 208 > > > > > > > > > > After: > > > > > # Overhead Command gfp_flags > > > > > # ........ ....... ................... > > > > > # > > > > > 99.89% perf GFP_NOFS|GFP_ZERO > > > > > 0.06% sleep GFP_KERNEL > > > > > 0.03% perf GFP_KERNEL|GFP_ZERO > > > > > 0.01% perf GFP_KERNEL > > > > > > > > hum, maybe we want some way to switch back to numbers? > > > > OK. Maybe something like 'kmem:kmalloc.gfp_flags/raw' ? > > ok.. and some option that would make it happen globaly ;-)
How about '--raw-trace' then?
Thanks, Namhyung
| |