Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config | From | "Shi, Yang" <> | Date | Mon, 14 Dec 2015 14:02:18 -0800 |
| |
Hi folks,
I tried to enable latencytop for arm64 and came across this discussion, so any plan about when this will get merged into mainline? 4.5 merge window?
Thanks, Yang
On 11/10/2015 3:34 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote: >> From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> >> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:10:04 +0000 >> Subject: [PATCH] Kconfig: remove HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT >> >> As illustrated by a3afe70b83fd ("[S390] latencytop s390 support."), >> HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT is defined by an architecture to advertise an >> implementation of save_stack_trace_tsk. >> >> However, as of 9212ddb5eada ("stacktrace: provide save_stack_trace_tsk() >> weak alias") a dummy implementation is provided if STACKTRACE=y. >> Given that LATENCYTOP already depends on STACKTRACE_SUPPORT and selects >> STACKTRACE, we can remove HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT altogether. >> >> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> >> --- >> arch/arc/Kconfig | 3 --- >> arch/arm/Kconfig | 5 ----- >> arch/metag/Kconfig | 3 --- >> arch/microblaze/Kconfig | 3 --- >> arch/parisc/Kconfig | 3 --- >> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 3 --- >> arch/s390/Kconfig | 3 --- >> arch/sh/Kconfig | 3 --- >> arch/sparc/Kconfig | 4 ---- >> arch/unicore32/Kconfig | 3 --- >> arch/x86/Kconfig | 3 --- >> lib/Kconfig.debug | 1 - >> 12 files changed, 37 deletions(-) > > Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >
| |