lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm64: add HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT config
From
Date
Hi folks,

I tried to enable latencytop for arm64 and came across this discussion,
so any plan about when this will get merged into mainline? 4.5 merge window?

Thanks,
Yang


On 11/10/2015 3:34 AM, Heiko Carstens wrote:
>> From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:10:04 +0000
>> Subject: [PATCH] Kconfig: remove HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT
>>
>> As illustrated by a3afe70b83fd ("[S390] latencytop s390 support."),
>> HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT is defined by an architecture to advertise an
>> implementation of save_stack_trace_tsk.
>>
>> However, as of 9212ddb5eada ("stacktrace: provide save_stack_trace_tsk()
>> weak alias") a dummy implementation is provided if STACKTRACE=y.
>> Given that LATENCYTOP already depends on STACKTRACE_SUPPORT and selects
>> STACKTRACE, we can remove HAVE_LATENCYTOP_SUPPORT altogether.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arc/Kconfig | 3 ---
>> arch/arm/Kconfig | 5 -----
>> arch/metag/Kconfig | 3 ---
>> arch/microblaze/Kconfig | 3 ---
>> arch/parisc/Kconfig | 3 ---
>> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 3 ---
>> arch/s390/Kconfig | 3 ---
>> arch/sh/Kconfig | 3 ---
>> arch/sparc/Kconfig | 4 ----
>> arch/unicore32/Kconfig | 3 ---
>> arch/x86/Kconfig | 3 ---
>> lib/Kconfig.debug | 1 -
>> 12 files changed, 37 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-12-14 23:21    [W:0.082 / U:0.400 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site