lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: staging: lustre: Less checks in mgc_process_recover_log() after error detection
From
Date
>> Can you accept the proposed changes around the affected memory allocations?
>
> Just leave it as-is if there is no reason.

I suggest to make the implementation of the function "mgc_process_recover_log"
a bit more efficient.


>> Do you prefer to stash any changes together for a bigger update step?
>
> Yes. Patches 5 and 6 would be easier to review if they were folded into
> one patch.

I do not like patch squashing for my update suggestions here.

Regards,
Markus


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-12-14 14:01    [W:1.019 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site