Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 12 Dec 2015 12:06:08 -0200 | Subject | Re: README Cleanup Project | From | Diego Viola <> |
| |
I agree, I would like to apologize for this drama, I never intended to create any flamewars or anything.
I also have nothing against LILO itself which I used to use, it used to work great for me.
I just love Linux and I want to do what I can (and my best) to try to improve it.
Thanks, Diego
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Diego Viola <diego.viola@gmail.com> wrote: >> Why does the Linux kernel keep outdated cruft like this in tree? > > depends on the eye of the beholder. :-) > >> If you need lilo you can just run /sbin/lilo yourself, there is no >> need for this to be in the kernel, especially when the project is >> being phased out already. >> >> Should I send a patch removing all lilo entries from the project? > > You can do a patch which improves the existing README. > Removing stuff you don't like is not an improvement. > > -- > Thanks, > //richard
| |