lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH] lock_page() doesn't lock if __wait_on_bit_lock returns -EINTR
We have two reports of frequent crashes in btrfs where asserts in
clear_page_dirty_for_io() were triggering on missing page locks.

The crashes were much easier to trigger when processes were catching
ctrl-c's, and after much debugging it really looked like lock_page was a
noop.

This recent commit looks pretty suspect to me, and I confirmed that we
were exiting __wait_on_bit_lock() with -EINTR when it was called with
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE

commit 68985633bccb6066bf1803e316fbc6c1f5b796d6
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Tue Dec 1 14:04:04 2015 +0100

sched/wait: Fix signal handling in bit wait helpers

The patch below is mostly untested, and probably not the right solution.
Dave's trinity run doesn't explode immediately anymore, and I wanted to
get this out for discussion. A quick look on the list doesn't show
anyone else has tracked this down, sorry if it's a dup.

Reported-by: Dave Jones <dsj@fb.com>,
Reported-by: Jon Christopherson <jon@jons.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>

diff --git a/kernel/sched/wait.c b/kernel/sched/wait.c
index f10bd87..12f69df 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/wait.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/wait.c
@@ -434,6 +434,8 @@ __wait_on_bit_lock(wait_queue_head_t *wq, struct wait_bit_queue *q,
ret = action(&q->key);
if (!ret)
continue;
+ if (ret == -EINTR && mode == TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
+ continue;
abort_exclusive_wait(wq, &q->wait, mode, &q->key);
return ret;
} while (test_and_set_bit(q->key.bit_nr, q->key.flags));

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-12-12 17:41    [W:0.084 / U:0.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site