lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Dec]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3.19.y-ckt 084/164] thermal: exynos: Fix unbalanced regulator disable on probe failure
From
Date
On Thu, 2015-12-10 at 09:49 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 09.12.2015 22:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > W dniu 03.12.2015 o 01:58, Kamal Mostafa pisze:
> >> 3.19.8-ckt11 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >>
> >> ------------------
> >>
> >> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> >>
> >> commit 824ead03b78403a21449cb7eb153a4344cd3b4c8 upstream.
> >>
> >> During probe if the regulator could not be enabled, the error exit path
> >> would still disable it. This could lead to unbalanced counter of
> >> regulator enable/disable.
> >>
> >> The patch moves code for getting and enabling the regulator from
> >> exynos_map_dt_data() to probe function because it is really not a part
> >> of getting Device Tree properties.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
> >> Tested-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
> >> Fixes: 5f09a5cbd14a ("thermal: exynos: Disable the regulator on probe failure")
> >> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > This patch shouldn't be backported before 4.2. It fixes a bug introduced
> > in 4.2: 5f09a5cbd14a.
> >
> > For kernels <4.2 this bug does not exist but fortunately the patch looks
> > harmless. Anyway I think that still it shouldn't be ported for <4.2.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> >
>
> Sorry for the noise, I was wrong. Luis pointed out that the 5f09a5cbd14a
> was itself backported to 3.19 so this applies to backporting as well.

No worries. Thanks for reviewing this, Krzysztof.

-Kamal

> No objections from my side.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-12-10 18:01    [W:0.107 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site