Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:55:57 +0100 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, perf: Use INST_RETIRED.PREC_DIST for cycles:ppp |
| |
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 06:54:14AM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:41:51PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 04:28:09PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c > > > index 9dfbba5..ba41899 100644 > > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c > > > @@ -482,6 +482,9 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event) > > > /* Support for IP fixup */ > > > if (x86_pmu.lbr_nr || x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format >= 2) > > > precise++; > > > + > > > + if (x86_pmu.pebs_aliases) > > > + precise++; > > > > This is not accurate, it would allow :ppp for core2 for example, which > > does not at all support PREC_DIST events. > > > > Something like so on top? > > Yes that's fine. Thanks. > > Are you just applying it with that change, or should I resend a combined patch?
Yep, got it in. Thanks.
| |