Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 01 Dec 2015 15:24:13 +0100 | From | Daniel Borkmann <> | Subject | Re: memory leak in do_ipv6_setsockopt |
| |
On 12/01/2015 03:16 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 15:07 +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > >> Yeah, we miss inet6_destroy_sock() in SCTP. :-( >> >> Looks good to me. > > OK, I will send a formal (and tested ;) ) patch.
I was shortly wondering whether there could be a use-after-free by doing this after sctp_destroy_sock() due to the sctp_endpoint_destroy() that would eventually drop a ref on the socket, but the endpoint holds a separate ref, so we should be good.
Thanks, Daniel
| |