lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCHv3 3/4] x86/pci: Initial commit for new VMD device driver
From
Date


On 2015/11/4 23:14, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2015, Keith Busch wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:42:02PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Tue, 3 Nov 2015, Keith Busch wrote:
>>>>>> + msi_irqdomain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(NULL, &pci_chained_msi_domain_info,
>>>>>> + vmd_irqdomain);
>>>
>>> But that parent limitation does not matter simply because your
>>> msi_irqdomain does not follow down the hierarchy in the allocation
>>> path.
>>>
>>> So we can avoid the vmd_irqdomain creation completely. It's just
>>> wasting memory and has no value at all. Creating the msi domain with a
>>> NULL parent is possible.
>>
>> I'm having trouble following the hierarchy and didn't understand the
>> connection between the parent and msi comain. It's still new to me,
>> but I don't think a NULL parent is allowable with msi domains:
>>
>> pci_msi_setup_msi_irqs()
>> pci_msi_domain_alloc_irqs()
>> msi_domain_alloc_irqs()
>> __irq_domain_alloc_irqs()
>> irq_domain_alloc_irqs_recursive()
>> msi_domain_alloc()
>> irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent()
>>
>> The last call returns -ENOSYS since there parent is NULL. Was the
>> intension to allow no parent, or do I still need to allocate one to
>> achieve the desired chaining?
>
> Hmm, seems I missed that part. But that's a fixable problem. Jiang?
Hi Keith,
Could you please try the attached patch?
Thanks!
Gerry

>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
From 6db1568564f8edee626d1c168b22ed5502abc6eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Liu Jiang <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:25:07 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] msi: Relax msi_domain_alloc() to support parentless MSI
irqdomains

Previously msi_domain_alloc() assumes MSI irqdomains always have parent
irqdomains, but that's not true for the new Intel VMD devices. So relax
msi_domain_alloc() to support parentless MSI irqdomains.

Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Liu Jiang <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>
---
kernel/irq/msi.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/msi.c b/kernel/irq/msi.c
index 7e6512b9dc1f..e4d3d707efff 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/msi.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/msi.c
@@ -109,9 +109,11 @@ static int msi_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
if (irq_find_mapping(domain, hwirq) > 0)
return -EEXIST;

- ret = irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs, arg);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
+ if (domain->parent) {
+ ret = irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs, arg);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ }

for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
ret = ops->msi_init(domain, info, virq + i, hwirq + i, arg);
--
1.7.10.4
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-05 07:41    [W:0.056 / U:0.452 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site