lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] arm64: restore bogomips information in /proc/cpuinfo
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015, Jon Masters wrote:

> On 11/18/15, 1:15 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
>
> > As what Pavel Machek reported [1], some userspace applications depend on
> > bogomips showed by /proc/cpuinfo.
> >
> > Although there is much less legacy impact on aarch64 than arm, but it does
> > break libvirt.
> >
> > Basically, this patch reverts commit
> > 326b16db9f69fd0d279be873c6c00f88c0a4aad5
> > ("arm64: delay: don't bother reporting bogomips in /proc/cpuinfo"), but with
> > some tweak due to context change.
>
> On a total tangent, it would be ideal to (eventually) have something reported
> in /proc/cpuinfo or dmesg during boot that does "accurately" map back to the
> underlying core frequency (as opposed to the generic timer frequency). I have
> seen almost countless silly situations in the industry (external to my own
> organization) in which someone has taken a $VENDOR_X reference system that
> they're not supposed to run benchmarks on, and they've done it anyway. But
> usually on some silicon that's clocked multiples under what production would
> be. Then silly rumors about performance get around because nobody can do
> simple arithmetic and notice that they ought to have at least divided by some
> factor.

Be my guest my friend.

According to the common wisdom, the bogomips reporting is completely
senseless at this point and no one should expect anything useful from
it. Therefore I attempted to rehabilitate some meaning into it given
that we just can't get rid of it either and it continues to cause
dammage. You certainly saw where that has led me.


Nicolas


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-25 16:21    [W:0.139 / U:0.704 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site