lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: Obey indeed proportional scanning for kswapd and memcg
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:48:20PM +0800, Yaowei Bai wrote:
> Commit e82e0561dae9f3ae5 ("mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning
> requirements for kswapd") intended to preserve the proportional scanning
> and reclaim what was requested by get_scan_count() for kswapd and memcg
> by stopping reclaiming one type(anon or file) LRU and reducing the other's
> amount of scanning proportional to the original scan target.
>
> So the way to determine which LRU should be stopped reclaiming should be
> comparing scanned/unscanned percentages to the original scan target of two
> lru types instead of absolute values what implemented currently, because
> larger absolute value doesn't mean larger percentage, there shall be
> chance that larger absolute value with smaller percentage, for instance:
>
> target_file = 1000
> target_anon = 500
> nr_file = 500
> nr_anon = 400
>
> in this case, because nr_file > nr_anon, according to current implement,
> we will stop scanning anon lru and shrink file lru. This breaks
> proportional scanning intent and makes more unproportional.
>
> This patch changes to compare percentage to the original scan target to
> determine which lru should be shrunk.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com>

This one has gone back and forth a few times in the past. It really was
deliberate that the scanning was proportional to the scan target. While
I see what your concern is, it's unclear what the actual impact is. Have
you done any testing to check if the proposed new behaviour is actually
better?

--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-25 12:41    [W:0.090 / U:0.972 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site