lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 0/6] MT8173 IOMMU SUPPORT
From
Date
On Tue, 2015-11-24 at 11:38 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 01:58:13PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-10-23 at 11:26 +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:40:02PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> > > > But the mtk-iommu depend on the drivers/memory/mtk-smi.c(mtk-iommu
> > > > has called a function of the mtk-smi).
> > > > So if there is dependence here, How should we do to merge them?
> > >
> > > I can surely merge mtk-smi too, if it gets proper Reviewed-by and
> > > Acked-by tags from the maintainer(s).
> > >
> > >
> > > Joerg
> > >
> > Hi Joerg,
> >
> > About the driver/memory/, We don't know who is his maintainer.
> > MAINTAINERS file don't have drivers/memory maintainer.
> > From the history in drivers/memory/ it looks like most of the
> > drivers land with an ack from the architecture maintainer.
> > And Matthias Brugger is our "ARM/Mediatek SoC support" maintainer.
> >
> > Then do you mean that we need Matthias's ACK or whom others?
>
> Yes, I think the sub-architecture maintainer's ACK is probably going to
> be as good as it gets. Historically drivers/memory hasn't had enough of
> a common ground to instate a framework.
>
> Thierry

Got it.
Thanks very much for your reply.

> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-25 03:01    [W:0.051 / U:0.448 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site