lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: Asterisk deadlocks since Kernel 4.1
Date
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015, at 22:42, Stefan Priebe wrote:
>
> Am 18.11.2015 um 22:40 schrieb Hannes Frederic Sowa:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015, at 22:36, Stefan Priebe wrote:
> >> sorry here it is. What I'm wondering is why is there ipv6 stuff? I don't
> >> have ipv6 except for link local. Could it be this one?
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505105#c79
> >>
> >> Thread 31 (Thread 0x7f295c011700 (LWP 26654)):
> >> #0 0x00007f295de3287d in recvmsg () at
> >> ../sysdeps/unix/syscall-template.S:82
> >> #1 0x00007f295de52fcc in make_request (fd=35, pid=26631,
> >> seen_ipv4=<optimized out>, seen_ipv6=<optimized out>,
> >> in6ai=<optimized out>, in6ailen=<optimized out>) at
> >> ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:119
> >> #2 0x00007f295de5344a in __check_pf (seen_ipv4=0x7f295c00e85f,
> >> seen_ipv6=0x7f295c00e85e, in6ai=0x7f295c00e840,
> >> in6ailen=0x7f295c00e838) at
> >> ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/check_pf.c:271
> >> #3 0x00007f295de10007 in *__GI_getaddrinfo (name=0x7f295c00e8b0
> >> "10.12.12.55", service=0x7f295c00e8bc "2135",
> >> hints=0x7f295c00e910, pai=0x7f295c00e908) at
> >> ../sysdeps/posix/getaddrinfo.c:2389
> >
> > Can you also get a /proc/pid/stack stacktrace?
>
> Sure:
>
> For the thread:
> # cat /proc/26631/task/26654/stack
> [<ffffffffb34e5cdb>] __skb_recv_datagram+0x52b/0x5d0
> [<ffffffffb34e5db2>] skb_recv_datagram+0x32/0x40
> [<ffffffffb35227bc>] netlink_recvmsg+0x4c/0x300
> [<ffffffffb34d3863>] sock_recvmsg+0x13/0x20
> [<ffffffffb34d679e>] ___sys_recvmsg+0xee/0x230
> [<ffffffffb34d7739>] __sys_recvmsg+0x49/0x90
> [<ffffffffb34d7792>] SyS_recvmsg+0x12/0x20
> [<ffffffffb363f1ee>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x71
> [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

Ok, we are definitely in netlink code and thus have a correct(? at least
a netlink) netlink fd which is blocking and waiting for an answer. I
research the glibc code a little bit but I think that the occurrences of
ipv6 parameters are just generic glibc code.

Let me try to reproduce that.

Thanks,
Hannes


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-18 23:21    [W:0.073 / U:17.504 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site