[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/4] sched: introduce synchronized idle injection
On Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:21:27 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Gleixner <> wrote:

> >
> > > Okay. But it does mean that the defeault idle period is 5 ticks
> > > (50ms @ HZ=100) and not 5 ms
> > correct. my reason is to scale with various HZ values.
> So for smaller HZ values we get longer disruption. That's well thought
> out scaling.
well it might be too long for embedded systems who uses 100HZ. Is there
a better way to scale in sub tick level?

My original thought was for smaller HZ value, I assume they care less
about latency, so the idle injection period is proportional to what
they set for HZ.

 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-18 20:01    [W:0.078 / U:3.252 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site