Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:25:08 +0100 | From | Ludovic Desroches <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d2: add pio controller node |
| |
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:15:11AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> wrote: > >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Linus Walleij > >> <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: > >>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Ludovic Desroches > >>> <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Add pio4 controller node to enable pinmux and gpio. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com> > >>> > >>> Patch applied. > >> > >> Please don't merge DT changes through driver trees unless there's a > >> very specific reason to do so, since it introduces random conflicts. > > > > Sorry :( > > > > Even noted this in the pull request to Torvalds, it was in the bottom > > of my patch stack so had been in -next for ages, I was afraid it > > would create more problem than it solves if I reverted the patch, > > but I guess I should have done so anyways. > > Yeah, it's OK -- I spotted that pull request later as well. > > It's not a big deal in most specific instances, I'd say. It's just in > aggregate it becomes a bother. > > So, just see this as a public reminder since we've seen it creep into > other driver trees a bit more lately. Mistakes will still happen but > try to keep it down. And for those who submit patches, feel free to > point out in the patch that you don't expect the driver/subsystem > maintainer to apply it to help them out. >
Ok. Sorry, I didn't think it could cause so many conflicts if not taken by Nicolas.
Ludovic
| |