Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:00:41 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 02/13] dmaengine: Introduce dma_request_slave_channel_compat_reason() | From | Andy Shevchenko <> |
| |
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 17:43:04 Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> > >> > I assume that the sst-firmware.c case is a mistake, it should just use a >> > plain DMA_SLAVE and not DMA_MEMCPY. >> >> Other way around. >> > > Ok, I see. In that case I guess it also shouldn't call > dmaengine_slave_config(), right? I don't think that's valid > on a MEMCPY channel.
Hmm… That's right, though I suspect still one thing why it's done this way. Let's ask Vinod and Liam about that.
-- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
| |