lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH V5 8/9] PCI: OF: Move of_pci_dma_configure() to pci_dma_configure()
From
Date
+Arnd

On 17/11/15 15:00, Robin Murphy wrote:
> Hi Suravee,
>
> On 28/10/15 22:50, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>> This patch move of_pci_dma_configure() to a more generic
>> pci_dma_configure(), which can be extended by non-OF code (e.g. ACPI).
>>
>> This has no functional change.
>
> Unfortunately, it appears that it does...
>
>> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
>> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
>> CC: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
[...]
>> +/**
>> + * pci_dma_configure - Setup DMA configuration
>> + * @dev: ptr to pci_dev struct of the PCI device
>> + *
>> + * Function to update PCI devices's DMA configuration using the same
>> + * info from the OF node of host bridge's parent (if any).
>> + */
>> +static void pci_dma_configure(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct device *bridge = pci_get_host_bridge_device(dev);
>> +
>> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dev->dev.of_node) {
>
> Previously I was seeing of_dma_configure, and thus of_iommu_configure,
> called for every PCI device on Juno. The check above now prevents this
> happening, since the PCI devices are probed directly from the bus and
> don't have OF nodes of their own. They now get left in some
> half-configured state where arch_setup_dma_ops isn't called either.

Just to follow up on that, Arnd's patch to tidy up dma_get_ops (now
queued[1]) makes this even worse, since preventing arch_setup_dma_ops
being called means the PCI devices now get the dummy DMA ops which leave
the drivers failing to probe at all, IOMMU hacks or not :(

Robin.

[1]:https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git/commit/?h=fixes/core&id=1dccb598df549d892b6450c261da54cdd7af44b4

> Should this be checking bridge->parent->of_node rather than
> dev->dev.of_node (which seems to work), or am I missing something?
>
> Sorry I don't really have the bandwidth to look into this in detail
> myself, right now I'm just trying to get my magic hacks rebased ;)
>
> Robin.
>
>> + if (bridge->parent)
>> + of_dma_configure(&dev->dev, bridge->parent->of_node);
>> + }
>> +
>> + pci_put_host_bridge_device(bridge);
>> +}



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-18 13:21    [W:0.474 / U:3.352 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site