lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
Subjectirq_fpu_usable() is irreliable
From
Hi folks,

The availability of the FPU in kernel space, as you know, is
determined by this function:

bool irq_fpu_usable(void)
{
return !in_interrupt() ||
interrupted_user_mode() ||
interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle();
}

My understanding is that the first check is !in_interrupt(), because
if `current` is valid - if we are in process context - then we have a
place to store the existing FPU regs in kernel_fpu_begin, to be
restored later in kernel_fpu_end. Recently I've been tracking down a
problem in which irq_fpu_usable() returns false, yet a stack trace
shows the first function is the syscall entry point. This leads me to
believe that in_interrupt() is not an adequate way of testing for a
valid `current`. In my particular problematic case, the reason
in_interrupt() was returning false is because a number of
rcu_read_lock_bh()s were being held; IOW this is occurring in the
ndo_start_xmit path of a network driver.

I therefore propose changing the function to this:

bool irq_fpu_usable(void)
{
return (!in_irq() && !in_nmi()) ||
interrupted_user_mode() ||
interrupted_kernel_fpu_idle();
}

What would you think of that?

Thanks,
Jason


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-17 13:01    [W:0.056 / U:0.764 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site