lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 05/24] misc: max77693-haptic: use pwm_get_xxx() helpers where appropriate
Hi Krzysztof,

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 22:10:40 +0900
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> wrote:

> W dniu 16.11.2015 o 17:56, Boris Brezillon pisze:
> > Use pwm_get_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx field.
> > Doing that will ease adaptation of the PWM framework to support atomic
> > update.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > Patch generated with the following coccinelle script:
> >
> > --->8---
> > virtual patch
> >
> > @@
> > struct pwm_device *p;
> > expression e;
> > @@
> > (
> > -(p)->polarity = e;
> > +pwm_set_polarity((p), e);
> > |
> > -(p)->polarity
> > +pwm_get_polarity((p))
> > |
> > -(p)->period = e;
> > +pwm_set_period((p), e);
> > |
> > -(p)->period
> > +pwm_get_period((p))
> > |
> > -(p)->duty_cycle = e;
> > +pwm_set_duty_cycle((p), e);
> > |
> > -(p)->duty_cycle
> > +pwm_get_duty_cycle((p))
> > )
> > --->8---
> > ---
> > drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c b/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c
> > index 6d96bff..a038fb3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/misc/max77693-haptic.c
> > @@ -70,10 +70,11 @@ struct max77693_haptic {
> >
> > static int max77693_haptic_set_duty_cycle(struct max77693_haptic *haptic)
> > {
> > - int delta = (haptic->pwm_dev->period + haptic->pwm_duty) / 2;
> > + int delta = (pwm_get_period((haptic->pwm_dev)) + haptic->pwm_duty) / 2;
>
> Double parentheses over argument are not needed so just:
> pwm_get_period(haptic->pwm_dev) + ...

Actually it was generated with coccinelle, hence I didn't fix existing
coding style issues, but I have no problem fixing them.

Thanks,

Boris

>
> Beside that patch looks good, so with removing parentheses here and below:
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
> > int error;
> >
> > - error = pwm_config(haptic->pwm_dev, delta, haptic->pwm_dev->period);
> > + error = pwm_config(haptic->pwm_dev, delta,
> > + pwm_get_period((haptic->pwm_dev)));
> > if (error) {
> > dev_err(haptic->dev, "failed to configure pwm: %d\n", error);
> > return error;
> > @@ -245,7 +246,7 @@ static int max77693_haptic_play_effect(struct input_dev *dev, void *data,
> > * The formula to convert magnitude to pwm_duty as follows:
> > * - pwm_duty = (magnitude * pwm_period) / MAX_MAGNITUDE(0xFFFF)
> > */
> > - period_mag_multi = (u64)haptic->pwm_dev->period * haptic->magnitude;
> > + period_mag_multi = (u64)pwm_get_period((haptic->pwm_dev)) * haptic->magnitude;
> > haptic->pwm_duty = (unsigned int)(period_mag_multi >>
> > MAX_MAGNITUDE_SHIFT);
> >
> >
>



--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-16 15:21    [W:0.055 / U:0.716 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site