[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next: clean up the kbuild tree?
Dne 15.11.2015 v 18:58 Andi Kleen napsal(a):
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 11:27:05AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Michal,
>> I notice that the kbuild tree (relative to Linus' tree) only contains
>> lots of merges and these 2 commits from April 2014:
> Really should get in that patch officially. I have a variety of users.
> And it clearly has been tested long enough in linux-next :)
> Michal, enough to just repost it?

So the commit in kbuild.git tree is identical to what is being tested
out of tree? Could you nevertheless provide an updated changelog? One
(and actually only) of Linus' objections was that it was not clear at
all what the actual benefits for the kernel itself are. Do you have some
benchmarks perhaps, where LTO achieves a preformance gain? Also, did the
compile time impact change with gcc 5.x?


 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-16 14:21    [W:0.033 / U:19.980 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site