Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Nov 2015 13:37:18 +0100 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] x86/cpufeature: Remove unused and seldomly used cpu_has_xx macros |
| |
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:30:00PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: ...
> It's entirely silent on the difference between static_cpu_has() and > static_cpu_has_safe() - what makes the second one 'safe'?
Yeah, those really are lacking some more fleshy and detailed explanations. :-)
I'll document those properly.
Thanks.
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
| |