lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 3/3] x86/cpufeature: Remove unused and seldomly used cpu_has_xx macros
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:30:00PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
...

> It's entirely silent on the difference between static_cpu_has() and
> static_cpu_has_safe() - what makes the second one 'safe'?

Yeah, those really are lacking some more fleshy and detailed
explanations. :-)

I'll document those properly.

Thanks.

--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-10 14:01    [W:0.135 / U:0.320 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site