Messages in this thread | | | From | Andreas Schwab <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHv2] ARM64:Fix MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ | Date | Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:59:45 +0200 |
| |
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
> I think it makes sense to stick with the traditional definition > of MINSIGSTKSZ == "the minimum amount that you will always need, > add whatever you require yourself" and SIGSTKSZ == "Should be > enough for a couple of function calls".
The python3 testsuite wants to put two signal frames in a SIGSTKSZ stack.
Andreas.
-- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, schwab@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7 "And now for something completely different."
| |