On Sat, 3 Oct 2015, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:08:51AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > here's another update of the richacl patch queue.  At this stage, I would
> > like to ask for final feedback so that the core and ext4 code (patches
> > 1-19) can be merged in the 4.4 merge window.  The nfsd and nfs code should
> > then go through the respective maintainer trees.
> 
> Now way in this form even if everyone agrees we should have these
> bastard ACLs.  I certainly disagree.
> 

Where is the rationale for them?

This url doesn't work: http://acl.bestbits.at/richacl/





-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>