On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 01:33:49AM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> Hi Emil,
> 
> Thanks for your response,
> 
> On 04.10.2015 12:43, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > Hi Maciej,
> > 
> > On 2 October 2015 at 22:40, Maciej S. Szmigiero
> > <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name> wrote:
> >> Anybody here?
> >>
> >> I've already submitted this patch two times but received no response...
> >>
> > Seems that the maintainer (Thierry) isn't Cc'ed.
> 
> Yes, he was Cc'ed - see for example https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/512858/ .

Sorry, I never received any of your earlier patches. It's in none of my
mailboxes nor was it classified as spam. Even searching by message ID
doesn't give me a positive hit.

> > You might want to
> > split the DT binding and vendor prefix to separate patches.
> 
> Do you mean to first submit new vendor prefix then panel patch with docs?
> Or even docs separately?

This should be three patches: the vendor prefix is usually a separate
patch and needs an Acked-by from one of the device tree bindings
maintainers. The binding itself should also be a separate patch and the
driver changes should come last.

Thierry
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]