lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Oct]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] btrfs: bugfix: handle FS_IOC32_{GETFLAGS,SETFLAGS,GETVERSION} in btrfs_ioctl
> I suggest to add an anonymous union and add a u64 member that would
> force the type width:
>
> struct btrfs_ioctl_send_args {
> __s64 send_fd; /* in */
> __u64 clone_sources_count; /* in */
> union {
> __u64 __user *clone_sources; /* in */
> u64 __pointer_alignment;
> };
> __u64 parent_root; /* in */
> __u64 flags; /* in */
> __u64 reserved[4]; /* in */
> };

I am no expert, but would this change alone modify the user space ABI of a 32-bit Linux kernel?
I.e. people in the (presumably currently working) btrfs-send situation (32-bit) user space/32-bit kernel
would have to upgrade user space tools and kernel at the same time. Otherwise, they will encounter a non-working setup.
I think, my suggested patch does not change any working ABI, and no change to the user
space tools are necessary.


Sincerely,

Thomas Rohwer



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-10-29 21:01    [W:1.163 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site