lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Oct]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH] arm64: dts: Added syscon-reboot node for FSL's LS2085A SoC
Date


> -----Original Message-----
> From: J. German Rivera [mailto:German.Rivera@freescale.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 8:31 PM
> To: robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Sharma Bhupesh-B45370; Yoder Stuart-B08248; Li Yang-Leo-R58472; Rivera Jose-B46482
> Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: Added syscon-reboot node for FSL's LS2085A SoC
>
> Added sys-reboot node to the FSL's LS2085A SoC DT to leverage
> the ARM-generic reboot mechanism for this SoC. This mechanism
> is enabled through CONFIG_POWER_RESET_SYSCON.
>
> Signed-off-by: J. German Rivera <German.Rivera@freescale.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2085a.dtsi | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2085a.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2085a.dtsi
> index e281ceb..6f82163 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2085a.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2085a.dtsi
> @@ -131,6 +131,18 @@
> interrupts = <1 9 0x4>;
> };
>
> + rst_ccsr: rstccsr@1E60000 {
> + compatible = "syscon";
> + reg = <0x0 0x1E60000 0x0 0x10000>;
> + };
> +
> + reboot@65024000 {
> + compatible ="syscon-reboot";
> + regmap = <&rst_ccsr>;
> + offset = <0x0>;
> + mask = <0x2>;
> + };
> +

Drop the unit address "65024000", since you have no "reg" property.

The ePAPR explicitly says: "If the node has no reg property, the
@ and unit-address must be omitted and the node-name alone differentiates
the node from other nodes at the same level in the tree.

Also, other examples in the kernel just use plain "reboot" as
the name:

arch/arm/boot/dts/hisi-x5hd2.dtsi
arch/arm/boot/dts/vfxxx.dtsi
arch/mips/boot/dts/brcm/bcm6328.dtsi

Also, Bhupesh's LS2080A DTS updates were just accepte4d, and the device tree
name is no longer fsl-ls2085a.dtsi. You need to rebase on top of
those changes.

Thanks,
Stuart


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-10-27 17:41    [W:0.353 / U:0.332 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site